RVN: Stop Nick Shirley Act – who is still allowed to film fraud?
Nick Shirley filmed empty childcare sites and asked where the tax money had gone.
In Minnesota that went viral. Later at least one owner from that file pleaded guilty to millions in fraud.
In California something else followed.
Governor Newsom signed AB 2624. Critics call the law the Stop Nick Shirley Act.
The law expands the Safe at Home programme for people who assist immigrants. Their real address disappears from public records. In addition, sharing photos or personal data of those workers online is restricted when it is done “for harassment or violence”. Damages claims are attached. It takes effect in October 2027.
Supporters say: protection against doxxing and threats.
Opponents say: you make investigating subsidy flows more expensive and riskier, right after someone made those flows visible.
The pattern
First the images.
Then the moral relabelling: journalism becomes stalking, scrutiny becomes hate.
Then the rule.
The same tension as with the 1st Amendment Auditors.
The camera is legal until it becomes inconvenient.
Public information is public until it concerns the wrong counters.
Whether Shirley is right in every case is a separate question.
Some claims were later substantiated. Others were contested.
That distinction disappears once the law turns the investigator into the problem instead of the figures.
OIM way out
Do not canonise the influencer.
Do test the rule.
Who gets a substitute address, on what grounds, and how does the citizen still check whether public money lands where it should?
Protection against violence is legitimate.
Protection against questions is not.
Verifiable spending. Open registers where public money is involved.
Cameras in public space.
Hashes instead of reputation.
Question for you
If investigating subsidies leads to a law that hides addresses…
what is being protected: the aid worker, or the system behind them?
This post is 100% authentic and verifiable via:
https://openinternetmanifest.org/nl/hash-verifier
### RVN: Stop Nick Shirley Act – who is still allowed to film fraud?
Nick Shirley filmed empty childcare sites and asked where the tax money had gone.
In Minnesota that went viral. Later at least one owner from that file pleaded guilty to millions in fraud.
In California something else followed.
Governor Newsom signed AB 2624. Critics call the law the Stop Nick Shirley Act.
The law expands the Safe at Home programme for people who assist immigrants. Their real address disappears from public records. In addition, sharing photos or personal data of those workers online is restricted when it is done “for harassment or violence”. Damages claims are attached. It takes effect in October 2027.
Supporters say: protection against doxxing and threats.
Opponents say: you make investigating subsidy flows more expensive and riskier, right after someone made those flows visible.
### The pattern
First the images.
Then the moral relabelling: journalism becomes stalking, scrutiny becomes hate.
Then the rule.
The same tension as with the 1st Amendment Auditors.
The camera is legal until it becomes inconvenient.
Public information is public until it concerns the wrong counters.
Whether Shirley is right in every case is a separate question.
Some claims were later substantiated. Others were contested.
That distinction disappears once the law turns the investigator into the problem instead of the figures.
### OIM way out
Do not canonise the influencer.
Do test the rule.
Who gets a substitute address, on what grounds, and how does the citizen still check whether public money lands where it should?
Protection against violence is legitimate.
Protection against questions is not.
Verifiable spending. Open registers where public money is involved.
Cameras in public space.
Hashes instead of reputation.
**Question for you**
If investigating subsidies leads to a law that hides addresses…
what is being protected: the aid worker, or the system behind them?
#NickShirley #AB2624 #Fraud #FreeSpeech #RealityVsNarrative #RVN #OpenInternetManifest
https://openinternetmanifest.org
This post is 100% authentic and verifiable via:
https://openinternetmanifest.org/nl/hash-verifier
Deel dit bericht
Korte versie: Teaser voor X Raw Markdown: Exacte originele tekst (voor verifier) Unicode: Mooie opmaak voor Facebook / andere platforms
Comments
Want to comment? Log in with GitHub.
You can always read without an account.
💸 Support the Open Internet Manifest ❤️
This manifest only exists thanks to your donations.
Every satoshi or monero helps enormously (servers, domains, development).
Comments
Want to comment? Log in with GitHub.
You can always read without an account.