RVN: The word โomvolkingโ is no longer allowed ๐ฃ๏ธ
This week, a clear majority in the Dutch House of Representatives (including VVD, CDA and D66) voted in favour of the Klaver motion.
It calls on the government to no longer make agreements with politicians who spread the โomvolking theoryโ.
Omvolking.
A perfectly normal Dutch word. Literally: the replacement or transformation of a population.
Fact check
In 1970, the Netherlands was still over 95% native Dutch.
Today, the share of non-western migration background is around 14-17% and rising fast โ especially among young people in the major cities.
In Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague, native Dutch have been in the minority among young people for years.
This is not a conspiracy.
This is demography.
This is measurable through CBS figures, birth data, migration flows and population forecasts.
Yet the word that describes this phenomenon is now being lumped together with โfar-rightโ and โincitement to violenceโ.
The big lie
By declaring a word (and the phenomenon behind it) taboo, they hope to shut down the discussion.
Not by refuting the numbers.
Not by offering better policy.
But by poisoning the language itself.
First the statistics became โracistโ.
Now the words that name reality are labelled โdangerousโ.
Next step? Placing people who still use them outside the bounds of acceptable debate.
This is exactly what weโve been talking about
Facts are not racist.
Words that describe facts arenโt either.
โOmvolkingโ is not hate.
It is an accurate description of a demographic process that has been visible for decades to anyone willing to look.
Whether you call it โomvolkingโ, โdemographic replacementโ, โGreat Replacementโ or โpopulation changeโ โ the reality doesnโt change because of a different label.
OIM way out
A healthy society discusses major changes instead of banning them.
We must:
Stop making words taboo.
Put facts and figures at the centre, not moral panic.
Dare to talk about immigration, demography, integration and cultural compatibility โ without cancellation or motions.
Recognise that a people has the right to decide who can come in and in what numbers.
Anyone who wants to โbanโ a word because reality is uncomfortable is basically admitting they cannot win the argument.
Question to you
Do you still dare to use the word โomvolkingโ?
Or do you keep quiet because a parliamentary majority suddenly considers it far-right extremism?
Facts and the words that describe them are not dangerous.
They are necessary.
This post is 100% authentic and verifiable via:
https://openinternetmanifest.org/nl/hash-verifier
### RVN: The word 'omvolking' is no longer allowed ๐ฃ๏ธ
This week, a clear majority in the Dutch House of Representatives (including VVD, CDA and D66) voted in favour of the Klaver motion.
It calls on the government to **no longer make agreements** with politicians who spread the โomvolking theoryโ.
Omvolking.
A perfectly normal Dutch word. Literally: the replacement or transformation of a population.
**Fact check**
In 1970, the Netherlands was still over 95% native Dutch.
Today, the share of non-western migration background is around 14-17% and rising fast โ especially among young people in the major cities.
In Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague, native Dutch have been in the minority among young people for years.
This is not a conspiracy.
This is demography.
This is measurable through CBS figures, birth data, migration flows and population forecasts.
Yet the word that describes this phenomenon is now being lumped together with โfar-rightโ and โincitement to violenceโ.
**The big lie**
By declaring a word (and the phenomenon behind it) taboo, they hope to shut down the discussion.
Not by refuting the numbers.
Not by offering better policy.
But by poisoning the language itself.
First the statistics became โracistโ.
Now the words that name reality are labelled โdangerousโ.
Next step? Placing people who still use them outside the bounds of acceptable debate.
**This is exactly what weโve been talking about**
Facts are not racist.
Words that describe facts arenโt either.
โOmvolkingโ is not hate.
It is an accurate description of a demographic process that has been visible for decades to anyone willing to look.
Whether you call it โomvolkingโ, โdemographic replacementโ, โGreat Replacementโ or โpopulation changeโ โ the reality doesnโt change because of a different label.
**OIM way out**
A healthy society discusses major changes instead of banning them.
We must:
- Stop making words taboo.
- Put facts and figures at the centre, not moral panic.
- Dare to talk about immigration, demography, integration and cultural compatibility โ without cancellation or motions.
- Recognise that a people has the right to decide who can come in and in what numbers.
Anyone who wants to โbanโ a word because reality is uncomfortable is basically admitting they cannot win the argument.
**Question to you**
Do you still dare to use the word โomvolkingโ?
Or do you keep quiet because a parliamentary majority suddenly considers it far-right extremism?
Facts and the words that describe them are not dangerous.
They are necessary.
Time to reclaim the language.
#Omvolking #WordBan #FactsAreNotRacist #RealityVsNarrative #RVN #OpenInternetManifest
https://openinternetmanifest.org
This post is 100% authentic and verifiable via:
https://openinternetmanifest.org/nl/hash-verifier
Deel dit bericht
Korte versie: Teaser voor X Raw Markdown: Exacte originele tekst (voor verifier) Unicode: Mooie opmaak voor Facebook / andere platforms
Comments
Want to comment? Log in with GitHub.
You can always read without an account.
๐ธ Support the Open Internet Manifest โค๏ธ
This manifest only exists thanks to your donations.
Every satoshi or monero helps enormously (servers, domains, development).
Comments
Want to comment? Log in with GitHub.
You can always read without an account.